Internet Download Manager (IDM)

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Internet Download Manager (IDM)

A curated collection of the 2 best self hosted alternatives to Internet Download Manager (IDM).

Internet Download Manager (IDM) is a Windows download accelerator and manager that speeds up downloads, provides pause/resume and scheduling, integrates with browsers, and captures video/audio from web pages for organized, reliable downloads.

Alternatives List

#1
pyLoad

pyLoad

Self-hosted download manager for one-click hosters, HTTP/FTP, and premium accounts with a web UI, captchas handling, scheduling, and a large plugin ecosystem.

pyLoad screenshot

pyLoad is a web-based download manager focused on automating downloads from one-click hosters and file-sharing sites, with additional support for generic HTTP/FTP downloads. It runs as a daemon and is controlled through a browser UI and APIs, relying on a large plugin system for hosters, captchas, and container formats.

Key Features

  • Web interface to add, organize, and monitor downloads (packages/links, status, speed, progress)
  • Plugin ecosystem for one-click hosters, decrypters, container formats (e.g., DLC/CCF), and captchas
  • Premium account management for supported hosters (centralized credentials and automatic use)
  • CAPTCHA handling via plugins (interactive and/or external services depending on configuration)
  • Scheduler/reconnect and bandwidth/time-based control via configuration (commonly used to fit ISP limits)
  • Remote control interfaces: web UI plus programmatic access via RPC/API (project-provided interfaces)

Use Cases

  • Automate “one-click hoster” downloads (including premium accounts) on a home server
  • Run a headless download box you manage from a browser on LAN/VPN
  • Centralize downloads for a media workflow by fetching files to a NAS/storage directory

Limitations and Considerations

  • Hoster support quality depends heavily on plugins; breakage can occur when hosters change
  • Some advanced download features may require external tools/services through plugins (e.g., captcha services)

pyLoad is best suited for users who need automation and broad hoster support via plugins rather than a simple single-protocol downloader. Its web UI and daemon model make it practical for always-on servers, while the plugin system enables adaptation to many download sources.

3.7kstars
738forks
#2
TubeSync

TubeSync

TubeSync automatically downloads and organizes YouTube videos from channels/playlists into your library using a web UI, background jobs, and yt-dlp integration.

TubeSync screenshot

TubeSync is a web application for automatically downloading and archiving videos from YouTube sources (such as channels and playlists) into a local library. It provides a management UI to add sources, control download behavior, and keep content up to date via scheduled/background syncing.

Key Features

  • Web UI to manage YouTube sources (e.g., channels/playlists) and sync settings
  • Automatic syncing to download new videos as they appear
  • Uses yt-dlp for extraction/downloading and supports common yt-dlp options
  • Library-style organization of downloaded media and metadata
  • Background task processing for queued/scheduled downloads
  • Docker-based deployment with persistent volumes for configuration and media

Use Cases

  • Maintain an offline archive of specific YouTube channels/playlists
  • Build a personal media library of educational content for local playback
  • Automated collection of new uploads from selected creators

Limitations and Considerations

  • Primarily focused on YouTube-style sources supported by yt-dlp; availability depends on upstream site changes
  • Download success and metadata quality can vary based on yt-dlp extractor behavior and source restrictions

TubeSync is best suited for users who want a simple, repeatable way to track chosen YouTube sources and keep an offline library current. It pairs a straightforward web interface with a reliable downloader backend to automate ongoing updates.

2.6kstars
147forks

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running