Stats for Spotify

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Stats for Spotify

A curated collection of the 2 best self hosted alternatives to Stats for Spotify.

Stats for Spotify is a web app that connects to your Spotify account to display personalized listening statistics — top artists, tracks, albums and genres across selectable time ranges, with shareable charts and summaries.

Alternatives List

#1
Your Spotify

Your Spotify

A self-hosted web app that connects to Spotify and shows your listening stats, top tracks/artists, and personalized insights over time.

Your Spotify screenshot

Your Spotify is a self-hosted web application that connects to the Spotify Web API and presents your personal listening analytics in a clean dashboard. It focuses on surfacing your top content (tracks, artists, genres) and trends across different time ranges, giving you “Spotify Wrapped”-style insights anytime.

Key Features

  • Spotify OAuth login and data access via the Spotify Web API
  • Dashboard with top tracks and top artists across multiple time ranges
  • Listening insights such as recently played content and popularity/metadata views (where available via the API)
  • Search and drill-down pages for tracks/artists with detailed stats
  • Stores fetched data in a database to build history and speed up subsequent views
  • Docker/Docker Compose deployment for a single-host setup

Use Cases

  • Run a private “Spotify Wrapped”-style dashboard for your own account(s)
  • Track listening trends over time and compare short/medium/long-term favorites
  • Host a household dashboard (multiple users) for shared analytics with separate logins

Limitations and Considerations

  • Requires a Spotify account and a Spotify Developer application (client ID/secret) for OAuth
  • Analytics are limited to what Spotify exposes through its Web API; some metrics are not available or are rate-limited

It is a good fit for users who want ownership of their listening analytics and a persistent history beyond what Spotify’s client apps show. Deployment is straightforward for Docker users, and the UI is designed for quick exploration of top content and trends.

4.1kstars
176forks
View Details
#2
Maloja

Maloja

Maloja is a self-hosted music scrobbling server that stores plays from multiple clients and provides privacy-friendly statistics, charts, and an API for personal listening analytics.

Maloja screenshot

Maloja is a self-hosted scrobbling server and listening-history database. It collects plays (“scrobbles”) from compatible clients, stores them locally, and provides a web interface and API for analyzing your listening habits without relying on third-party services.

Key Features

  • Stores scrobbles in your own database and provides a web UI for browsing history and statistics
  • Multiple ingestion options: compatible scrobble clients and integrations via an HTTP API (for custom scripts/tools)
  • Rich personal analytics: charts, timelines, artists/albums/tracks rankings, and period-based breakdowns
  • User/library features designed for personal deployments (single-user focus with lightweight administration)
  • Data export/backup options to keep ownership of your listening history
  • Integrations intended as alternatives to hosted scrobble ecosystems (e.g., replacing Last.fm-style tracking)

Use Cases

  • Track and visualize personal listening history across players/devices in one place
  • Build your own “Spotify Wrapped”-style yearly/monthly reports from locally stored scrobbles
  • Feed scrobble data into custom dashboards or scripts using the API

Limitations and Considerations

  • Primarily oriented toward personal/small deployments; not a full social scrobbling network

Maloja fits users who want a private, durable listening-history store with useful stats and an API. It’s a practical replacement for hosted scrobble tracking when you prefer to keep your data under your control and accessible for custom analysis.

1.6kstars
80forks
View Details

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • •Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • •No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • •Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • •Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running